The Philosophy and Semantics of the Cognitive Science of Religion
Issue: Vol 3 No. 1 (2015)
Journal: Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion
Subject Areas: Religious Studies Cognitive Studies Linguistics
Abstract:
This article brings philosophy into dialogue with cognitive science of religion (CSR). After a brief overview of CSR and theories of meaning, we explore the philosophical semantic constraints of CSR. We focus on how the beliefs and behaviours of religious adherents, as conceived by CSR, can be meaningful in ways that illuminate the scholar’s understanding of religious phenomena. We argue that CSR is committed to an externalist and holistic semantics. This highlights a potentially problematic tension between the beliefs of religious people and the explanations proposed by CSR. We end by suggesting that this tension could be resolved if CSR were to give more attention to external factors (e.g., biological, cultural, environmental etc.).
Author: Mark Q. Gardiner, Steven Engler
References :
Andresen, Jensine. 2001. Religion in Mind: Cognitive Perspectives on Religious Belief, Ritual, and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586330
Anttonen, Veikko. 2000. “Toward a Cognitive Theory of the Sacred: An Ethnographic Approach.” Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 14: 41–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2000.14.sacred
Atran, Scott. 2002. In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion, Evolution and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Atran, Scott, and Ara Norenzayan. 2004. “Religion’s Evolutionary Landscape: Counterintuition, Commitment, Compassion, Communion.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 27(6): 713–770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000172
Barrett, Justin L. 1998. “Cognitive Constraints on Hindu Concepts of the Divine.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37(4): 608–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1388144
Barrett, Justin L. 1999. “Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 11(4): 325–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006899X00078
Barrett, Justin L. 2000. “Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 29–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9
Barrett, Justin L. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Barrett, Justin L. 2007. “Cognitive Science of Religion: What Is It and Why Is It?” Religion Compass 1(6): 768–786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2007.00042.x
Barrett, Justin L., and Frank C. Keil. 1996. “Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity: Anthropomorphism in God Concepts.” Cognitive Psychology 31 (3): 219–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0017
Block, N. E. D. 1987. “Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 10(1): 615–678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1987.tb00558.x
Boyer, Pascal. 1990. Tradition As Truth and Communication: A Cognitive Description of Traditional Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521058
Boyer, Pascal. 1994. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Burge, Tyler. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4(1): 73–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. “Language and Nature.” Mind 104(413): 1–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/104.413.1
Cohen, Emma. 2007. The Mind Possessed: The Cognition of Spirit Possession in an Afro-Brazilian Religious Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323351.001.0001
Davidson, Donald. 1984a. “Belief and the Basis of Meaning (1974).” Synthese 27(3/4): 309–323.
Davidson, Donald. 1984b. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davis, G. Scott. 2007. “Donald Davidson, Anomalous Monism and the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 19(3/4): 200–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006807X243106
Egan, Frances. 2012. “Representationalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels, and Stephen P. Stitch, 250–272. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.003.0011
Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2009. “Religion as Superhuman Agency: On E. Thomas Lawson and Robert N. McCauley (1990), Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture.” In Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion, edited by Michael Stausberg, 22–38. London: Routledge.
Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. 2010. “Ten Implications of Semantic Holism for Theories of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 22(4): 275–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006810x531067
Engler, Steven, and Mark Q. Gardiner. forthcoming. “A Critical Response to Cognitivist Theories of Religion.” In Theory/Religion/Critique: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, edited by Richard King. New York: Columbia.
Fodor, Jerry A. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Explorations in Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frankenberry, Nancy, ed. 2002. Radical Interpretation in Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613906
Frankenberry, Nancy, and Hans H. Penner, eds. 1999. Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth-Century Theory and Method in Religion. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
Gardiner, Mark Q., and Steven Engler. 2010. “Charting the Map Metaphor in Theories of Religion.” Religion 40(1): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2009.08.010
Gardiner, Mark Q., and Steven Engler. 2012. “Semantic Holism and the Insider-Outsider Problem.” Religious Studies 48(2): 239–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412511000205
Geertz, Armin W. 2004. “Cognitive Approaches to the Study of Religion.” In New Approaches to the Study of Religion. Volume 2: Textual, Comparative, Sociological, and Cognitive Approaches, edited by Armin W. Geertz, Peter Antes, Randi R. Warne, 347–400. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Godlove, Terry F. 1989. Religion, Interpretation, and Diversity of Belief: The Framework Model from Kant to Durkheim to Davidson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Godlove, Terry F. 1999. “Religious Discourse and First Person Authority.” In The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion; A Reader, edited by Russell T. McCutcheon, 164–178. London: Cassell.
Godlove, Terry F. 2002. “Saving Belief: On the New Materialism in Religious Studies.” In Radical Interpretation in Religion, edited by Nancy K. Frankenberry, 10–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613906.003
Guthrie, Stewart. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haselager, Pim, André de Groot, and Hans van Rappard. 2003. “Representationalism vs. Anti-Representationalism: A Debate for the Sake of Appearance.” Philosophical Psychology 16(1): 5–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0951508032000067761
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2003. The Study of Religion in a New Key: Theoretical and Philosophical Soundings in the Comparative and General Study of Religion. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2004. “Meaning and Religion: On Semantics in the Study of Religion.” In New Approaches to the Study of Religion. Volume 1: Regional, Critical and Historical Approaches, edited by Armin W. Geertz Peter Antes, Randi R. Warne, 219–252. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2009. “Religion as the Unintended Product of Brain Functions in the ‘Standard Cognitive Science of Religion Model’: On Pascal Boyer, Religion Explained (2001) and Ilkka Pyysiainen, How Religion Works (2003).”
In Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion, edited by Michael Stausberg, 129–155. London and New York: Routledge.
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2010. “Doing it the Other Way Round: Religion as a Basic Case of “Normative Cognition’.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 22(4): 322–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006810X531102
Kamppinen, Matti. 2001. “Cognitive Study of Religion and Husserlian Phenomenology: Making Better Tools for the Analysis of Cultural Systems.” In Religion in Mind: Cognitive Perspectives on Religious Belief, Ritual, and Experience, edited by Jensine Andresen, 193–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586330.008
Lawson, E. Thomas. 2000. “Towards a Cognitive Study of Religion.” Numen 47(3): 338–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852700511586
Lawson, E. Thomas, and Robert N. McCauley. 1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, Gabriel. 2012. “False But Significant: The Development of Falsity in Religious Cognition in Light of the Holism of the Mental.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24(2): 143–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006812X632865
Margolis, Eric, Richard Samuels, and Stephen P. Stich. 2012a. “Introduction: Philosophy and Cognitive Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels and Stephen P. Stich, 3–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.001.0001
Margolis, Eric, Richard Samuels, and Stephen P. Stich, eds. 2012b. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Näreaho, Leo. 2008. “The Cognitive Science of Religion: Philosophical Observations.” Religious Studies 44(1): 83–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034412507009328
Penner, Hans H. 1994. “Holistic Analysis: Conjectures and Refutations.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 62(4): 977–996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/LXII.4.977
Penner, Hans H. 1999. “Why Does Semantics Matter?” In Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth-Century Theory and Method in Religion, edited by Nancy K. Frankenberry and H. H. Penner, 473–506. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
Putnam, Hilary. 1973. “Meaning and Reference.” Journal of Philosophy 70(19): 699–711. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025079
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume 2, 215–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2001. How Religion Works: Towards a New Cognitive Science of Religion. Leiden: Brill.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2004. Magic, Miracles, and Religion: A Scientist’s Perspective. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2012. “Cognitive Science of Religion: State-of-the-Art.” Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 1(1): 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.v1i1.5
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. “Epistemology Naturalized.” In The John Dewey Essays in Philosophy, 69–90. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schilbrack, Kevin. 2002. “The Study of Religious Belief after Donald Davidson.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14(3/4): 334–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006802320909756
Shapiro, Lawrence A. 2012. “Embodied Cognition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science, edited by Eric Margolis, Richard Samuels and Stephen P. Stich, 118–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195309799.003.0006
Sosis, Richard, and Candace S. Alcorta. 2003. “Signaling, Solidarity and the Sacred: The Evolution of Religious Behaviour.” Evolutionary Anthropology 12(6): 264–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evan.10120
Staal, Fritz. 1979. “The Meaninglessness of Ritual.” Numen 26(2): 2–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852779X00244
Stausberg, Michael. 2009. “There Is Life in the Old Dog Yet.” In Contemporary Theories of Religion: A Critical Companion, edited by Michael Stausberg, 1–21. London: Routledge.
Whitehouse, Harvey. 1998. “The Epidemiology of Representations: Biological and Cognitive Perspectives on the Transmission of Culture.” Anthropology Today 14(6): 19–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2783237
Whitehouse, Harvey. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Whitehouse, Harvey, and Robert N. McCauley. 2005. Mind and Religion: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Wilson, David Sloan. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226901374.001.0001