References :

Argueta, R., Huff, J., Tingen, J., & Corn, J. O. (2011). Laptop initiatives: Summary of research across six states. Raleigh: Friday Institute for Educational Innovation, North Carolina State University.

Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50, 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. New York: Continuum.

Bustamante, C., & Moeller, A. (2013). The convergence of content, pedagogy, and technology in online professional development for teachers of German: An intrinsic case study. CALICO Journal, 30, 82–104. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.1.82-104

Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681

Chinnery, G. (2008). Biting the hand that feeds me: The case for e-language learning and teaching. CALICO Journal, 25, 471–481.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cutrim Schmid, E. C. (2011). Video-stimulated reflection as a professional development tool in interactive whiteboard research. ReCALL, 23, 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000176

Cutrim Schmid, E. C., & Hegelheimer, V. (2014). Collaborative research projects in the technology-enhanced language classroom: Pre-service and in-service teachers exchange knowledge about technology. ReCALL, 26, 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000135

Cutrim Schmid, E. C., & Whyte, S. (2012). Interactive whiteboards in state school settings: Teacher responses to soci-constructivist hegemonies. Language Learning & Technology, 16(2), 65–86.

Dooly, M. (2009). New competencies in a new era? Examining the impact of a teacher training project. ReCALL, 21, 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009990085

Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2013). Filling in the gaps: Linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher education. ReCALL, 25, 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000237

Ducate, L., & Arnold, N. (2011). Technology, CALL and the Net Generation: Where are we headed from here? In N. Arnold and L. Ducate (Eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching (pp. 1–22). San Marcos, TX: CALICO Publications.

Ebsworth, M. E., Kim, A. J., & Klein, T. J. (2010). Projections: From a graduate TELL class to the practical world of L2 teachers. CALICO Journal, 27, 349–375. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.349-375

Egbert, J. (2006). Learning in context: Situating language teacher learning in CALL. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 166–181). New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14.15egb

Egbert, J., Paulus, T., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 108–126.

Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Research on learning and teaching with Web 2.0: Bridging conversations. Educational Researcher, 38, 280–283. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336675

Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856

Hong, K. H. (2010). CALL teacher education as an impetus for L2 teachers in integrating technology. ReCALL, 22, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400999019X

Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO Journal, 25, 175–188.

Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2006). The scope of CALL education. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher Education in CALL (pp. 3–22), New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14

Inserra, A., & Short, T. (2012). An analysis of high school math, science, social studies, English, and foreign language teachers’ implementation of one-to-one computing and their pedagogical practices. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 41, 145–169. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.41.2.d

Kárpáti, A. (2009). Web 2 technologies for the net native language learners: A “social CALL.” ReCALL, 21, 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000160

Kessler, G. (2006). Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do better?. In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher Education in CALL (pp. 23-44), New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14.05kes

Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701331394

Kessler, G. (2010). When they talk about CALL: Discourse in a required CALL class. CALICO Journal, 27, 379–382. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.376-392

Klette, K., & Carlsten, T. C. (2012). Knowledge in teacher learning. In K. Jensen, L .C. Lahn, & M. Nerland (Eds.), Professional learning in the knowledge society (pp. 69–84). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-994-7_4

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Leakey, J. (2011). Evaluating computer-assisted language learning. New York: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0353-0131-1

Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2010). Materials development in three Italian CALL projects: Seeking an optimal mix between in-class and out-of-class learning. CALICO Journal, 27, 529–539. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.3.529-539

Loveless, A. (2011). Technology, pedagogy and education: Reflections on the accomplishment of what teachers know, do and believe in a digital age. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20, 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.610931

Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, J. D. (2012). Do one-to-one initiatives bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.1.a

Maftoon, P., & Shahini, A. (2012). CALL normalization: A survey on inhibitive factors. The JALT CALL Journal, 8, 17–32.

McNeil, L. (2013). Exploring the relationship between situated activity and CALL learning in teacher education. ReCALL, 25, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000086

National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (NSFLEP). (2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages (W-RSLL). Alexandria, VA: The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Retrieved from: http://www.actfl.org/publications/all/world-readiness-standards-learning-languages

O’Dowd, R., & Ware, P. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220902778369

Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT Observation Scheme. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

Ware, P., & Hellmich, E. (2014). CALL in the K-12 Context: Language Learning Outcomes and Opportunities. CALICO Journal, 31, 140–157. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.2.140-157

Wesely, P. M. (2013). Investigating the community of practice of world language educators on Twitter. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113489032

Williams, L., Abraham, L. B., & Bostelmann, E. D. (2014). A discourse-based approach to CALL training and professional development. Foreign Language Annals, 47, 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12119

Wong, L., & Benson, P. (2006). In-service CALL education: What happens after the course is over? In P. Hubbard & M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 251–266). New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.14.21won