References :

Caws, C., & Heift, T. (in press.) Evaluation in CALL: Tools, interactions, outcomes. In L. Murray & F. Farr Routledge handbook of language learning and technology. (n.p.) London, UK: Routledge.

Chun, D. (2012). Replication studies in CALL research. CALICO Journal, 29 (4), 591–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.4.591-600

Collentine, J. (1998). Processing instruction and the subjunctive. Hispania, 81, 576–587. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/345673

Godwin-Jones, R. (2015). The evolving roles of language teachers: Trained coders, local researchers, global citizens. Language Learning & Technology, 19 (1), 10–22.

Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska. K. M. (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47 (4), 356–381.

Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 457–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x

Kessler, G. (2013). Collaborative language learning in co-constructed participatory culture. CALICO Journal, 30 (3), 307–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.3.307-322

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2013). Rethinking global perspectives and local initiatives in language teaching. In S. Ben Said & L. J. Zhang (Eds), Language teachers and teaching: Global perspectives and local initiatives, 317–323. New York, NY: Routledge.

Porte, G. (2013). Who needs replication? CALICO Journal, 30 (1), 10–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.1.10-15

Smith, B., & Schulze, M. (2013). Thirty years of the CALICO Journal – replicate, replicate, replicate. CALICO Journal, 30 (1), i–iv. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.1.i-iv

Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology 14 (2), 95–110.