References :

Bazerman, C. (1988) Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Madison
Press.
Bazerman, C. (1998) Emerging perspectives on the many dimensions of scientific discourse.
In J. R. Martin and R. Veel (eds) Reading Science 15–28. London: Routledge.
Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. (1995) Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication:
cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse: a genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Christie, F. and Unsworth, L. (2000) Developing socially responsible language research.
In L. Unsworth (ed.) Researching Language in Schools and Communities 1–26. London:
Cassell.
Crismore, A. and Farnsworth, R. (1990) Metadiscourse in popular and professional science
discourse. In W. Nash (ed.) The Writing Scholar: studies in academic discourse Vol.
3 118–136. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Eggins, S. (1994) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.
Englander, K. (2006) Non-native English-speaking scientists’ successful revision for
English-language publication: a discourse analytic and social constructivist study.
Unpublished PhD dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Englander, K. (forthcoming) Transformation of the identities of nonnative English
speaking scientists as a consequence of the social construction of revision. Journal of
Language, Identity and Education.
Fernández Polo, F. J. (1999) Traducción y Retórica Contrastiva: A Propósito de la
Traducción de Textos de Divulgación Científica del Inglés al Español [Translation and
Contrastive Rhetoric: a Proposal for the Translation of Popular Texts from English to
Spanish]. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Servicio de Publicacións.
Flowerdew, J. (1999) Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: the case of
Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 8: 243–264.
Flowerdew, J. (2000) Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the
non-native English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly 34: 127–150.
Flowerdew, J. (2001) Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions.
TESOL Quarterly 35: 121–150.
Gilbert, G. N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: a sociological analysis of
scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gosden, H. (1992) Research writing and NNSs: from the editors. Journal of Second
Language Writing 1: 123–139.
Gosden, H. (1993) Discourse functions of subjects in scientific research articles. Applied
Linguistics 14: 56–75.
Gosden, H. (2003) ‘Why not give us the full story?’ Functions of referees’ comments in
peer reviews of scientific research papers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2:
87–101.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993) Writing Science: literacy and discursive power.
Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional
Grammar. (Third edition.) London: Arnold.
Hyland, K. (1999) Writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds)
Writing: texts, processes and practices 99–121. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary Discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow,
England: Longman.
Kerans, M. E. (2001) Eliciting substantive revision of manuscripts for peer review through
process-oriented conferences with Spanish scientists. In C. Muñoz (ed.) Trabajos en
Lingüística Aplicada [Essays in Applied Linguistics] 339–347. Barcelona: Universitat de
Barcelona.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and
contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kourilová, M. (1996) Interactive functions of language in peer reviews of medical papers
written by non-native users of English. Unesco ALSED-LSP Newsletter 19(1): 4–21.
Lewin, B. A., Fine, J. and Young, L. (2001) Expository Discourse: a genre-based approach to
social science research texts. London: Continuum.
Lock, G. (1996) Functional English Grammar: an introduction for second language teachers.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R. and Veel, R. (1998) Reading Science: critical and functional perspectives on
discourses of science. London: Routledge.
Martín-Martín, P. and Burgess, S. (2004) The rhetorical management of academic criticism
in research article abstracts. Text 24(2): 171–195.
Martínez, I. A. (2001) Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the
transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes 20: 227–247.
Martínez, I. A. (2003) Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology
journal articles in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 103–123.
McGinty, S. (1999) Gatekeepers of Knowledge: journal editors in the sciences and the social
sciences. Westport, CN: Bergin & Garvey.
Montaño-Harmon, M. R. (1991) Discourse features of written Mexican Spanish: current
research in contrastive rhetoric and its implications. Hispania 74: 417–425.
Myers, G. (1989) The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics
10(1): 1–35.
O’Donnell, M. (2002) Systemic Coder – a text markup tool, version 4.5 users guide (March
2002) Retrieved on 24 August 2005 from http://www.wagsoft.com/Coder/section1.html
Olson, D. R. (1977/1988) From utterance to text: the bias of language in speech and writing.
Reprinted in E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll, and M. Rose (eds) Perspectives on Literacy
175–189. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Prior, P. (1998) Writing Disciplinarity: a sociohistoric account of literate activity in the
academy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ravelli, L. (2000) Getting started with functional analysis of texts. In L Unsworth (ed.)
Researching Language in Schools and Communities 27–64. London: Cassell.
St. John, M. (1987) Writing processes of Spanish scientists publishing in English. English
for Specific Purposes 1: 113–120.
Samraj, B. (2005) An exploration of a genre set: research article abstracts and introductions
in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 24: 141–156.
Santos García, S. (2001) Diferencia en las convenciones retóricas del inglés y del español
y su influencia en la escritura en inglés como idioma extranjero por hispanohablantes
Mexicanos [Difference in the rhetorical conventions of English and Spanish and their
influence in writing in English as a foreign language by Mexican Spanish-speakers].
Mextesol Journal 24(3): 35–49.
Shashok, K. (1992) Educating international authors. European Science Editing 45: 5–7
(January).
Simpson, J. M. (2000) Topical structure analysis of academic paragraphs in English and
Spanish. Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 293–309.
Stake, R. E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Ventola, E. and Mauranen, A. (1991) Non-native writing and native revising of scientific
articles. In E. Ventola (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics 457–492. Berlin: Mouton
de Gruyter.
Wood, A. (1997) International scientific English: some thoughts on science, language and
ownership. Scientific Tribune. Retrieved 7 April from http://www.tribunes.com/tribune/
art97/wooda.htm