Emerging Literacies in Online Learning
Issue: Vol 4 No. 1 (2007) JAL Vol 4, No 1 (2007)
Journal: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Subject Areas: Writing and Composition Linguistics
DOI: 10.1558/japl.v4i1.79
Abstract:
Online learning is becoming integral to the experience of increasing numbers of students in higher education. This can range from courses delivered entirely online through to different manifestations of e-learning where students study part of their course electronically, or to simple e-mail exchanges between tutors and students. Despite the written nature of the texts produced in these learning environments, to date little attention has been paid to them as writing. In response, this paper is concerned with the written construction of meaning making in online learning. Building on the perspective that literacies are central to the learning experience, it draws on data from student messages, to each other, in an online postgraduate course in professional education and argues that we should approach these online textual interactions as sites of academic writing. The paper highlights evidence of ‘intertextuality’, ‘metadiscourse’ and ‘epistemic modality’ in students’ message postings. It suggests that in foregrounding these textual features it is possible to unpack the nature of the writing and emerging literacies in online learning. It concludes that student messages are institutionally significant spaces for the negotiation of ownership and authority in the meaning making process
Author: Mary R. Lea
References :
Bazerman, C. (1988) Shaping Written Knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental
article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bazerman, C. (2004) Intertextuality: how texts rely on other texts. In C. Bazerman and
P. Prior (eds) What Writing Does and How it Does it: an introduction to analyzing texts
and textual practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bonk, C. and King, K. (eds) (1998) Electronic Collaborators. Learner-Centred Technologies
for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coates, J. (1987) Epistemic modality and spoken discourse. Transactions of the Philological
Society 110–131.
Duffy, T. M. and Jonassen, D. H. (1992) Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction.
London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: textual analysis for social research. London/
New York: Routledge.
Garrison, R. and Anderson, T. (2003) E-Learning in the 21st Century. London and New
York: Routledge Falmer.
Goodfellow, R. and Lea, M. R. (2007) Challenging E-learning in the University: a literacies
perspective. Maidenhead and New York: Mc GrawHill / SRHE/ Open University Press.
Goodfellow, R., Lea, M. R., Gonzalez, F. and Mason, R. (2001) Opportunity and e-quality:
intercultural and linguistic issues in global online learning. Distance Education 22(1):
65–84.
Goodfellow, R., Morgan, M., Lea, M. and Pettit, J. (2004) Students’ writing in the virtual
university: an investigation into the relation between online discussion and writing
for assessment on two masters courses. In I. Snyder and C. Beavis (eds) Doing Literacy
Online: teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world 25–44. Hampton: Hampton
Press.
Hyland, K. (2005) Metadiscourse. London/New York: Continuum.
Ivanič, R. (1998) Writing and Identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic
writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jonassen, D. H. and Land, S. M. (eds) (2000) Theoretical Foundations of Learning
Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jones, C., Turner, J. and Street, B. (eds) (1999) Students Writing in the University: cultural
and Epistemological Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Knox, M. (1992) ‘I thought I could write until I came here’. Competing discourses: an
examination of student writing in the context of academic discourse as ideology.
Unpublished MA dissertation, Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of Sussex.
Lea, M. R. (2000) Computer conferencing: new possibilities for writing and learning in
higher education. In M. R. Lea and B. Stierer (eds) Student Writing in Higher Education:
new contexts 69–85. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/ Open
University Press.
Lea, M. R. (2001) Computer conferencing and assessment: new ways of writing in higher
education. Studies in Higher Education 26(2): 163–182.
Lea, M. R. and Stierer, B. (eds) (2000) Student Writing in Higher Education: new contexts.
Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
Lea, M. R. and Street, B. V. (1998) Student writing in higher education: an academic
literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23(2): 157–172.
Lillis, T. (2001) Student Writing: access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
McKenna, C. (2003) From skills to subjects: the reconceptualisation of writing development
in higher education. In C. Rust (ed.) Improving Student Learning: theory and
practice 67–74. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Morgan, W., L. Russell, A. and Ryan, M. (2002) Informed opportunism: teaching for
learning in uncertain contexts of distributed learning. In M. R. Lea and K. Nicoll (eds)
Distributed Learning: social and cultural approaches to practice. London/ USA/Canada:
Routledge Falmer.
Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.