Foreign Language Learners’ Beliefs about CALL: The Case of a U.S. Midwestern University
Issue: Vol 34 No. 2 (2017)
Journal: CALICO Journal
Subject Areas:
DOI: 10.1558/cj.28226
Abstract:
A significant body of research has examined language learners’ attitudes toward particular technologies used in foreign language classrooms. However, literature is scarce on foreign language learners’ beliefs toward computer-assisted language learning (CALL) in general. To narrow this gap, we investigated the constructs that compose a system of language learners’ beliefs toward CALL at a large U.S. university and examined whether the amount of technology used and the target language (TL) play a role in shaping learners’ beliefs. The findings of this large-scale survey of 2,061 students studying nineteen different TLs indicate four factors comprising learners’ belief systems toward CALL in this context: efficacy of technology for language learning and its connection to motivation, satisfaction with technology used in the learners’ classes, specific benefits of technology, and the importance of computer skills and technical support. Learners’ CALL beliefs were more positive when they had had more exposure to technology in their classes, but this varied based on the TL. Higher use of technology outside of class resulted in more positive beliefs across the board, independent of the TL. The pedagogical implications are that greater exposure to effective and varied models of CALL might result in more positive beliefs toward it.
Author: Tetyana Sydorenko, Ching-Ni Hsieh, Seongmee Ahn, Nike Arnold
References :
Alanen, R. (2003). A sociocultural approach to young language learners’ beliefs about language learning. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 55–85). Dordrecht: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_3
Anyaegbu, R., Ting, W., & Li, Y. (2012). Serious game motivation in an EFL classroom in Chinese primary school. TOJET, 11(1), 154–164. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ976578.pdf
Arnold, N. (2007). Technology-mediated learning 10 years later: Emphasizing pedagogical or utilitarian applications? Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 161–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02859.x
Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2015). Contextualized views of practices and competencies in CALL teacher education research. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 1–9. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2015/commentary.pdf
Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 241–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/call.15.3.241.8189
Barcelos, A. M. F., & Kalaja, P. (2011). Introduction to Beliefs about SLA Revisited. System, 39(3), 281–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.001
Barr, D. (2004). Students and ICT: An analysis of student reaction to the use of computer technology in language learning. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 36(2), 19–38.
Bell, T. (2005). Behaviors and attitudes of effective foreign language teachers: Results of a questionnaire study. Foreign Language Annals, 38(2), 259–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02490.x
Blake, R., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M., & Pardo-Ballester, C. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 114–127. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num3/blakeetal.pdf
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81‒109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39, 370–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.009
Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 46–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x
Chapelle, C. (2010). Evaluating computer technology for language learning. TESL-Ontario, 36, 56–67.
Chen, J. J., & Yang, S. C. (2014). Fostering foreign language learning through technology-enhanced intercultural projects. Language Learning & Technology 18(1), 57–75. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2014/yangchen.pdf
Cohen, B. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, A. D., & Dornyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170–190). London: Arnold.
Diab, R. L. (2006). University students’ beliefs about learning English and French in Lebanon. System, 34(1), 80–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.014
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fatemi Jahromi, S. A., & Salimi, F. (2013). Exploring the human element of computer-assisted language learning: An Iranian context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 158–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.643411
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guichon, N., & Hauck, M. (2011). Editorial: Teacher education research in CALL and CMC: More in demand than ever. ReCALL, 23, 187‒199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000139
Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 283–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04190.x
Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27, 557–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00050-0
Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Introduction. In P. Kalaja & M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 1–4). Dordrecht: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0
Lai, C. (2013). A framework for developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 100–122. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2013/lai.pdf
Lai, C., & Gu, M. Y. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 317–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.568417
Lai, C., & Morrison, B. (2013). Towards an agenda for learner preparation in technology-enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 154–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.2.154-162
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x
Lu, J., Throssell, P., & Jiang, H. (2013). Exploring the application of computer-assisted English learning in a Chinese mainland context: Based on students’ attitudes and behaviours. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(3), 31–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v3n3p31
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56, 429–440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
Mori, Y. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning? Language Learning, 49, 377–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00094
Murday, K., Ushida, D., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2008). Learners’ and teachers’ perspectives on language online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 125–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220801943718
Öz, H. (2015). Investigating the relationship between foreign language learning and CALL attitudes among EFL freshman students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 1041–1049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.576
Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27, 38–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226
Rivera, G. M., & Matsuzawa, C. (2007). Multiple-language program assessment: Learners’ perspectives on first-year and second-year college foreign language programs and their implications for program improvement. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 569–583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02881.x
Scida, E. E., & Saury, R. E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 517–531. Retrieved from https://calico.org/html/article_104.pdf
Schulz, R. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x
Steel, C. H., & Levy, M. (2013). Language students and their technologies: Charting the evolution 2006–2011. ReCALL, 25, 306–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000128
Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stockwell, G. (2013). Technology and motivation in English language teaching and learning. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges (pp. 156–175). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sydorenko, T. (2011). Exploring the potential of rehearsal via automatized structured tasks versus face-to-face pair work to facilitate pragmatic and oral development. (Doctoral dissertation) Michigan State University. Dissertation Abstracts International 3464977.
van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2009). (Re)situating the role(s) of new technologies in world language teaching and learning. In R. Oxford & J. Oxford (Eds.), Second language teaching and learning in the Net generation (pp. 9–21). Manoa, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Wang, L., Ertmer, P.A., & Newby, T.J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414
Wesely, P. M. (2012). Learner attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs in language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), s98–s117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01181.x
Winke, P., Goertler, S., & Amuzie, G. (2010). Commonly taught and less commonly taught language learners: Are they equally prepared for CALL and online language learning? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 199–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.486576
Woods, D., 2003. The social construction of beliefs in the language classroom. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 201–229). Dordrecht: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_9