Item Details

Women as Teachers and Disciples in Early Buddhist Communities: The Evidence of Epigraphy

Issue: Vol 9 No. 1 (2015)

Journal: Religions of South Asia

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies

DOI: 10.1558/rosa.v9i1.29442

Abstract:

Inscriptions from ancient India reveal to us two related phenomena about early Buddhist nuns: firstly, that nuns were teachers of other women, and secondly that nuns considered themselves to be (or were recorded to be) direct disciples of male monastic teachers. The first of these is confirmed by the textual evidence, and sits as part of our picture of the lives of nuns at the time of the historical Buddha and subsequently. The second, however, challenges assumptions about the operations of early Buddhist communities. Monastic male-female teaching relationships, according to the textual evidence, were largely formal and institutional, as typified by the role of monk advisor to nuns (bhikkhunovādaka). As recorded in the texts, nuns should formally request instruction from monks, and certain monks were charged with dispensing such duties. The monastic malefemale teaching relationships recorded in the epigraphy do not chime with this state of affairs, instead suggesting that closer and more personal relationships existed.

Author: Alice Collett

View Original Web Page

References :

Anālayo. 2010. ‘Attitudes towards Nuns: A Case Study of the Nandakovāda in the Light of its Parallels.’ Journal of Buddhist Ethics 17: 332–400.


— 2011. ‘Chos sbyin gyi mdo, Bhikṣuṇī Dharmadinnā Proves Her Wisdom.’ Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal 24: 3–33.


Barnes, Nancy J. 2000. ‘The Nuns at the Stūpa: Inscriptional Evidence for the Lives and Activities of Early Buddhist Nuns in India.’ In Ellison Banks Findly (ed.), Women’s Buddhism, Buddhism’s Women: Tradition, Revival, Renewal: 17–38. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.


Bloch, T. 1905–1906. ‘Two Inscriptions on Buddhist Images.’ In E. Hultzsch (ed.), Epigraphia Indica: 8.179–82. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.


Brancaccio, Pia. 2010. The Buddhist Caves at Aurangabad: Transformations in Art and Religion. Leiden: Brill.


Brodbeck, Simon Pearse. 2009. The Mahābhārata Patriline: Gender, Culture and Royal Hereditary. Surrey: Ashgate.


Burgess, J. A. S. 1996 [1886]. The Buddhist Stupas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta in the Krishna District, Madras Presidency, Surveyed in 1882. With Translations of the Aśoka Inscriptions at Jaugada and Dhauli, by Georg Bühler. Archaeology Survey of Southern India, IV. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.


Burgess, J. A. S., and Bhagwanlal Indraji. 1881. Inscriptions from the Cave-Temples of Western India with Descriptive Notes, &c. Archaeological Survey of Western India, Reports, old series, no. 10.


Collett, Alice. 2015. Lives of Early Buddhist Nuns: Biographies as History. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.


Collett, Alice (ed.). 2013. Women in Early Indian Buddhism: Comparative Textual Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.


Das Gupta, C. C. 1949–1950. ‘Shelarwadi Cave Inscriptions.’ Epigraphia Indica 28: 76–77.


Dehejia, Vidya. 1969–1970. ‘Early Activity at Amaravati.’ Archives of Asian Art 23 (4): 1–54.


— 1972. Early Buddhist Rock Temples: A Chronology. London: Thames and Hudson.


Dutt, Nalinaksha. 1931. ‘Notes on the Nagarjunikonda Inscriptions.’ The Indian Historical Quarterly 7 (3): 633–53.


Ferguson, James, and James Burgess. 1880. The Cave Temples of India. London: W. H. Allen and Co.


Gross, Rita. 1993. Buddhism after Patriarchy: A Feminist History, Analysis, and Reconstruction of Buddhism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.


Hinüber, Oskar von, and Peter Skilling. 2013. ‘Two Buddhist Inscriptions from Deorkothar (Dist. Rewa, Madhya Pradesh).’ Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 16: 13–26.


Horner, I. B. 1990 [1930]. Women under Primitive Buddhism, Laywomen and Almswomen. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.


Kieffer-Pülz, Petra. 2013. ‘Buddhist Nuns in South India as Reflected in the Andhakaṭṭhakathā and in Vajrabuddhi’s Anugaṇṭhipada.’ Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 16: 29–46.


Lüders, H. 1912. A List of Brahmi Inscriptions: from the Earliest Times to about AD 400 with the Exception of those of Asoka. Appendix to Epigraphia Indica 10. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.


— 1961. Mathura Inscriptions. K. L. Janert (ed.). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.


— 1963. Bhārhut Inscriptions. Revised and supplemented by E. Waldschmidt and M. A. Mehendale. Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum 2, pt 2. Ootacamund: Government Epigraphist for India.


Marshall, John, and Alfred Foucher. 1983 [1939]. The Monuments of Sāñchī. 3 vols. New Delhi: Swati Publications.


Mehendale, Madhukar Anant. 1997 [1948]. Historical Grammar of Inscriptional Prakrit. Pune: Deccan College.


Nakanishi, Maiko, and Oskar von Hinüber. 2014. ‘Kanaganahalli Inscriptions.’ Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 18, supplement: 1–197.


Pischel, R. 1999. A Grammar of the Prakrit Languages, trans. from German by Subhadra Jha. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass (original: Grammatik der Prakrit-sprachen, Strassburg: Trübner, 1900).


Salomon, Richard. 1998. Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and Other Indo-Aryan Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.


Salomon, Richard, and Joseph Marino. 2014. ‘Observations on the Deorkothar Inscriptions and their Significance for the Evaluation of Buddhist Historical Traditions.’ Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University 17: 27–39.


Sarma, I. K. 1978. ‘Epigraphical Discoveries at Guntupalli.’ Journal of the Epigraphical Society of India 5: 48–60.


Senart, E. 1902–1903. ‘Inscriptions at the Caves at Karle.’ In E. Hultzsch (ed.), Epigraphia Indica: 7.47–75. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.


Senart, E. 1905–1906. ‘The Inscriptions in the Caves at Nāsik.’ In E. Hultzsch (ed.), Epigraphia Indica: 8.59–97. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.


Schopen, Gregory. 2004. Buddhist Monks and Business Matters: Still More Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.


Shah, Kirit K. 2001. The Problem of Identity: Women in Early Indian Inscriptions. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.


Shimada, Akira. 2012. Early Buddhist Architecture in Context: The Great Stūpa at Amarāvatī (ca. 300 bce–300 ce). Leiden: Brill.


Skilling, Peter. 2001. ‘Nuns, Laywomen, Donors, Goddesses: Female Roles in Early Indian Buddhism.’ Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 24 (2): 241–74.