References :

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.24

Alqahtani, M. (2011). An Investigation into the language needs of Saudi students studying in British postgraduate programmes and the cultural difference impacting on them. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Southampton. Retrieved from
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/198175/6.hasCoversheetVersion/Binder1.pdf

Apple, M.W. (1988). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131728809335493

Barber, C. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In F. Behre (Ed.), Contributions to English syntax and philology: Gothenburg studies in English (Vol. 14, pp. 21–43). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

Bawarshi, A.S., & Reiff, M.J. (Eds.). (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West Lafayette: Parlor.

Benesch, S. (2009). Theorizing and practicing critical English for academic purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 81-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.09.002

Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100013668

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024

Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 97–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.00

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). “Take a look at…”: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25, 401-435. http://dx.doi:10.1093/applin/25.3.371

Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (1986). Language for specific purposes: Practice and theory. Centre for Language and Communication Studies Occasional Papers, 19. Dublin: Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED280285.pdf

Blue, G.M. (1988). Individualising academic writing tuition. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Academic writing: Process and product. Oxford: Modern English Publications.

Burgess, S., & Cargill, M. (2013). Using genre analysis and corpus linguistics to teach research article writing. In V. Matarese (Ed.), Supporting research writing: Roles and challenges in multilingual settings (pp. 55–71). Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.

Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2013). Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps (2nd ed.). Chichester & West Sussex, UK; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/g.w.m.rauterberg/lecturenotes/2009-Writing_Scientific_Research_Articles.pdf

Charles, M. (2014). Getting the corpus habit: EAP students’ long-term use of personal corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 30-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.11.004

Cheng, A. (2015). Genre analysis as a pre-instructional, instructional, and teacher development framework. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 125-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.004

Chun, C. (2015). Power and meaning making in an EAP classroom. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.008

Chun, C. (forthcoming). Critical literacy writing in ESP: Perspectives and approaches. In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline-specific writing: theory into practice. London: Routledge.

Connor, U. (1999). How like you our fish? Accommodation in international business communication. In M. Hewings and C. Nickerson (Eds.), Business English: Research into Practice (pp. 115–128). Harlow, UK: Longman.

Connor, U. (2000). Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists. Text, 20(1), 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.1

Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, 17, 391–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.02.001

Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587951

Douglas, D. (2013). ESP and assessment. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 367–383). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M.J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: CUP. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00026-5

Ewer, J.R., & Latorre, G. (1969). A course in basic scientific English. London: Longman.
Feng, H. (2008). A genre-based study of research grant proposals in China. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout & W.V. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric (pp. 63–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Flowerdew, J. (1993). An educational, or process approach to the teaching of professional genres. ELT Journal, 47(4), 305–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.4.305

Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the non-native English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 127–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588099

Flowerdew, J. (2004). Corpus of PhD literature reviews. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.

Flowerdew, J. (2007). The non-Anglophone scholar on the periphery of scholarly publication.
AILA Review, 20(1), 14-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aila.20.04flo

Flowerdew, J. (2013). English for research publication purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 301–321). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch16

Flowerdew, J. (2015). John Swales’s ideas on pedagogy in Genre Analysis: A view from 25 years on. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 102-112. http://dx.doi.org/1010.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.003

Flowerdew, J., & Forest R.W. (2015). Signalling nouns in English: A corpus-based discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/CBO9781139135405

Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). The EAP curriculum: Issues, methods, and challenges. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 176–194). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766.015

Flowerdew, J., & Wan, A. (2010). The linguistic and the contextual in applied genre analysis: The case of the company audit report. English for Specific Purposes, 29(2), 78–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.07.001

Flowerdew, J., & Wang, S.H. (forthcoming). Teaching English for research publication purposes with a focus on genre, register, textual mentors and language re-use: a case study. In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice. London: Routledge.

Flowerdew, L. (2010). Using corpora for writing instruction. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 444–457). London & New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949.ch32

Flowerdew, L. (2013). Needs analysis and curriculum development in ESP. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 325–346). Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch17

Flowerdew, L. (2015). Using corpus-based research and online academic corpora to inform writing of the discussion section of a thesis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 58–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.001

Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2013). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35, 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015

Gardner, S., & Nesi, H. (2013). A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 34(1) 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams024

Gavioli, L. (2006). Exploring corpora for ESP learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.21

Gee, J. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00593_6.x

Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. Harlow: Longman.

Granger, S. (2015). Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 7–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra

Hadley, G. (2015). English for academic purposes in neoliberal universities: A critical grounded theory. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra

Hafner, C., Miller, L., and Ng, C. (undated). Academic literacy practices of university science students: A needs analysis. Final report on academic literacy practices of university science students. Department of English. City University of Hong Kong. http://www1.english.cityu.edu.hk/acadlit/sites/default/files/Academic%20literacies%20in%20university%20science%20students.pdf

Halliday, M.A.K. (2014) An Introduction to functional grammar. (4th ed.). Revised by C.M.I.M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge.

Halliday, M., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The Linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3724120

Harwood, N., & Hadley, G. (2004). Demystifying institutional practices: Critical pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 23, 355–377. http://eric.ed.gov/?redir=http%3a%2f%2fdx.doi.org%2f10.1016%2fj.esp.2003.08.001

Herbert, A.J. (1965). The structure of technical English. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662

Horowitz, D. (1986). What professors actually require of students: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 445–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586294

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/327576

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587657

Hyland, K. (2002a). Teaching and researching writing. London: Longman/Pearson. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.1.85

Hyland, K. (2002b). Specificity revisited: How far should we go? English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 385–395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2FS0889-4906%2801%2900028-X

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000068

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2008). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1473-4192.2008.00178.x

Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic writing. Cambridge: Cambridge Applied Linguistics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams070

Hyland, K., & Sancho Guinda, C. (Eds.). (2013). Stance and voice in written academic Genres. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825

Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693-722. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587930

Ivaniç, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The Discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/swll.5

Johns, A.M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587966

Johns, A.M. (2011). The future of genre in L2 writing: Fundamental, but contested, instructional decisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 56–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.003

Johns, T. (2002). Data-driven learning: The perpetual challenge. In B. Kettemann & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis. (pp. 107–117), Amsterdam: Rodopi. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.7.1526-1531

Jordan, B. (2002). The growth of EAP in Britain. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 69–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00004-8

Kaplan, R.B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16(1), 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x

Kuteeva, M. (2013). Graduate learners' approaches to genre-analysis tasks: Variations across and within four disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 32(2), 84–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.11.004



Kuteeva, M. & Mauranen, A. (Eds.). (2014). Writing for publication in multilingual contexts. Special issue of Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.002

Lee, D., & Swales, J. (2006). A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.010

Li, Y. (2006). A doctoral student of physics writing for publication: A sociopolitically-oriented case study. English for Specific Purposes, 24(4), 456–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.esp.2005.12.002

Li, Y. (2007). Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: An “intraview” of an NNES graduate student writing a research article. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 55–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00040.x

Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”. Written Communication, 25, 353–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088308319229

Lillis, T., & Curry, M.J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.

Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5

Lackstrom, J.E., Selinker, L., & Trimble, L.P. (1973). Technical rhetorical principles and grammatical choice. TESOL Quarterly, 7(2), 127–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3585556

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350070111

Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1994). A communicative grammar of English (2nd ed.). London: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/329369

Maroko, G.M. (2013). Citation practices in selected science and humanities dissertations: Implications for Teaching. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 126–136.

Martin, J.R., & Rose, D. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt044

Martín-Martín, P. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 25–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00033-3

Moreno, A.I. (2004). Retrospective labelling in premise-conclusion metatext: An English-Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and economics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 321–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.005


Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tesq.200

O’Dell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in non-academic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor & S.A. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing: principles and methods (pp. 220–236). New York: Longman.

Parkinson, J. (fortcoming). Teaching writing for science and technology. In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice. London: Routledge.

Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 253–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00019-7

Prior, P. (1998). Writing/Disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 407–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586978

Sanderson, T. (2008). Interaction, identity and culture in academic writing: The case of German, British and American academics in the humanities. In A. Ädel & R. Reppen (Eds), Corpora and discourse: The challenges of different settings (pp. 57-92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/scl.31.05san

Sharff, J., & Lessinger, J. (1994). The academic sweatshop: Changes in the capitalist infrastructure and the part-time academic. Anthropology Today, 10(5), 12-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/awr.1994.15.1.2

Simpson-Vlach, R., & Nick C.E. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 463–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058

Smart, G. (2006). Writing the economy: Activity, genre and technology in the world of banking. London: Equinox Publishing. 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021943608328081

Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 29–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587060

Starfield, S. (2002). “I`m a second-language English speaker”: Negotiating writer identity and authority in sociology one. Journal of Language Identity and Education, 1(2), 121–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0102_02

Suárez, L., & Moreno, A.I. (2008). The rhetorical structure of academic book reviews of literature: An English-Spanish cross-linguistic approach. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout & W. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive rhetoric: reaching to intercultural rhetoric (pp. 147–168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.169.10sua

Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90010-9

Swales, J.M. (2012). A text and its commentaries: Toward a reception history of “genre in three traditions” (Hyon 1996). Ibérica, 24, 103–115. Retrieved from http://www.aelfe.org/documents/09_24_Swales.pdf

Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2000). English in today’s research world: a writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00025-X

Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2015). Tensions between the old and the new in EAP textbook revision: A tale of two projects. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 299–319). London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-27628-5_10

Tardy, C.M. (2012). Writing and language for specific purposes. In The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431

Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1981). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. The ESP Journal, 1(2), 123–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-2380(81)90004-4

Thompson, P. (2013). Thesis and dissertation writing. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 283–300). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch15

Trimble, L.P. (1985). English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(86)90011-6

Widdowson, H.G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilkins, D.A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.