Disciplinary positioning struggles: Perspectives from early career academics
Issue: Vol 12 No. 2 (2015)
Journal: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Subject Areas: Writing and Composition Linguistics
DOI: 10.1558/jalpp.32820
Abstract:
With no existing panel for applied linguistics at the last Research Excellence Framework (REF) in 2014, academics working in this field in the UK struggle to position their work and themselves as researchers. Yet, gaining recognition for one’s expertise and positioning oneself in disciplinary terms are rites of passage for all academic researchers. This paper agues that disciplines, rather than being clearly defined and static areas of knowledge, are instead constituted and demarcated through the enactment of discursive practices. Focusing on qualitative research interviews with three early career academics out of a corpus of 30 interviews with academics from various career stages, and informed by ideas from Bakhtinian polyphony and positioning theory, I demonstrate how these academics often resist positions imposed on them by unnamed voices in larger discourses which constitute mainstream expectations about academia. The findings highlight how respondents’ struggles to position their research relate to changing institutional demands in the current climate of higher education in the UK. This paper also contributes to our understanding of disciplinary positioning as enacted through the qualitative research interview.
Author: Sixian Hah
References :
Abbott, A. (2001) Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Angermüller, J. (2011) From the many voices to the subject positions in anti-globalization discourse: Enunciative pragmatics and the polyphonic organization of subjectivity. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (12): 2992–3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.013
Angermuller, J. (2013) How to become an academic philosopher: Academic discourse as a multileveled positioning practice. Sociología Histórica 2: 263–289.
Angermuller, J. (2014) Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis: Subjectivity in Enunciative Pragmatics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442475
Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. (eds) (1998) Identities in Talk. London: Sage.
Archer, L. (2008) Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity. Studies in Higher Education 33 (4): 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/
03075070802211729
Bakhtin, M. (1981 [1934–1935]) Discourse in the novel. In M. Bakhtin (author) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, 269–422. Trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press
Bakhtin, M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. W. Vern. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and The Culture of Disciplines. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Benwell, B. and Stokoe, E. (2006) Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Billig, M. (1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (2013) Learn to Write Badly: How to Succeed in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139208833
Billot, J. (2010) The imagined and the real: Identifying the tensions for academic identity. Higher Education Research and Development 29 (6): 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.487201
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
Candlin, C. N. and Sarangi, S. (2004) Making applied linguistics matter. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i1.1
Clegg, S. (2008) Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal 34 (3): 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532269
Davies, B. and Harré, R. (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
De Fina, A. and Perrino, S. (2011) Introduction: Interviews vs.‘natural’ contexts: A false dilemma. Language in society 40 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000849
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2016) BAAL Response to REF Consultation. Available online: http://www.baal.org.uk/REF_consultation_response_2016.pdf
Fløttum, K. (2005) The self and the others: Polyphonic visibility in research articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00079.x
Georgakopoulou, A. (2015) Small stories research. In A. G. De Fina (ed.) The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, 255–271. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/
9781118458204.ch13
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harré, R. and Van Langenhove, L. (1999) Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of International Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hellermann, J. (2015) Three contexts for my work as co-editor: Introduction to the special issue. In J. Hellermann and A. Mauranen (eds) Definitions for Applied Linguistics. Special issue of Applied Linguistics 36 (4): 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv043
Henkel, M. (2005) Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education 49 (1): 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2919-1
Hyland, K. (2012) Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, A. (2002) So…?: Pragmatic implications of so-prefaced questions in formal police interviews. In J. Cotterill (ed.) Language in the Legal Process, 91–110. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Knights, D. and Clarke, C. A. (2014) It’s a bittersweet symphony, this life: Fragile academic selves and insecure identities at work. Organization Studies 35 (3): 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613508396
Laudel, G. and Gläser, J. (2008) From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of early career researchers. Higher Education 55 (3): 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7
Mann, S. (2016) The Research Interview: Reflective Practice and Reflexivity in Research Processes. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137353368
Myers, G. (1990) Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Nølke, H. (2006) The semantics of polyphony (and the pragmatics of realization). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38 (1): 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2006.10412206
Rapley, T. J. (2001) The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analysing interviews. Qualitative Research 1 (3): 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/
146879410100100303
Raymond, G. (2004) Prompting action: The stand-alone ‘So’ in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4
Sutherland, K. A. (2017) Constructions of success in academia: An early career perspective. Studies in Higher education 42 (4): 743–759.
Tanggaard, L. (2007) The research interview as discourses crossing sword: The researcher and apprentice on crossing roads. Qualitative Inquiry 13 (1): 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294948
Watermeyer, R. (2012) From engagement to impact? Articulating the public value of academic research. Tertiary Education and Management 18 (2): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.641578
Wooffitt, R. and Clark, C. (1998) Mobilizing discourse and social identities in knowledge talk. In C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds) Identities in Talk, 107–120. London: Sage.