Item Details

Religious Heterogamy in Xiamen: The Social and Ritual Boundaries of Chinese Protestantism

Issue: Vol 1 No. 2 (2017)

Journal: Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology

Subject Areas:

DOI: 10.1558/isit.33595

Abstract:

Many young Protestants in the Chinese city of Xiamen marry a non-Christian spouse. How does religious heterogamy illuminate the social and ritual boundaries created by Protestants in Xiamen? Considering the function and permeability of these metaphoric boundaries, how should we visualize them? This article draws on data collected between August 2014 and February 2016. Intermarriage with non-Christians is condemned by most ministers in Xiamen, but it is an essential option for young women who far outnumber marriageable men in most church communities. The resulting weddings are marked by a search for compromises among the bride and groom, their parents, and the social communities for whom their parents host the wedding. It is argued that in terms of function and permeability, the social and ritual boundaries of Protestantism in Xiamen are less like barbed-wire fences than like the gates of a subway system, or the emergency exit of a shopping mall. Since a central aim of Chinese Protestants is to recruit more people to the faith, there is room for women to briefly exit the community and to re-enter with a converted husband. This focus on boundaries as metaphors may contribute to the field of interreligious studies, where boundaries are a key concept.

Author: Bram Colijn

View Original Web Page

References :

Beyer, P. (2003). "Social forms of Religion and Religions in Contemporary Global Society" in Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, ed. Dillon, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Cao N. (2005). "The Church as a Surrogate Family for Working Class Immigrant Chinese Youth: An Ethnography of Segmented Assimilation," Sociology of Religion, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 183-200.

Chau, A.Y. (2006). Miraculous Response: Doing Popular Religion in Contemporary China (Cambridge University Press).

⎯ (2012). "Efficacy, not Confessionality: On Ritual Polytropy in China," in Sharing the Sacra: The Politics and Pragmatics of Intercommunal Relations around Holy Places, ed. Glenn Bowman (New York: Berghahn Books, 2012), 79-96.

⎯ (2013). "A Different Kind of Religious Diversity: Ritual Service Providers and Consumers in China," in Religious Diversity in Chinese Thought, ed. Perry Schmidt-Leukel and Joachim Gentz (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

Duara, P. (1996). Rescuing History from the Nation. Questioning Narratives of Modern China. (London: The University of Chicago Press).

Durkheim, É. (1912 / 1976). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. (London: Allen & Unwin).

Grimes, R.L. (2014). The Craft of Ritual Studies (New York: Oxford University Press).

Lamont, M. and Molnár, V. (2002). "The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences," Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 28, pp. 167-95.

Loewenthal, K.M., MacLeod, A.K., and Cinnirella, M. (2002). "Are women more religious than men? Gender differences in religious activity among different religious groups in the UK," Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 32, pp. 133-139.

Moyaert, M. (2015). "Introduction," in Ritual Participation and Interreligious Dialogue: Boundaries, Transgressions, and Innovations, ed. Moyaert M. and Geldhof, J. (London: Bloomsbury).

Seligman, A.B., Puett, M.J., Weller, R.P., and Simon, B. (2008). Ritual and its Consequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity (New York: Oxford University Press).

Xu X., Ji J., and Tung Y.Y. (2000). "Social and Political Assortative Mating in Urban China," Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 47-77.

Yang F. (2005). "Lost in the Market, Saved at McDonald's: Conversion to Christianity in Urban China," Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 423-441.

Yang, M.M. (2008). "Introduction," in Chinese Religiosities: Afflictions of Modernity and State Formation, ed. Yang, M.M. (London: University of California Press).