Self-mention and authorial identity construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study
Issue: Vol 10 No. 2 (2014)
Journal: Linguistics and the Human Sciences
Subject Areas: Writing and Composition Linguistics
Abstract:
Self-mention is a powerful rhetorical strategy for constructing authorial identity in research articles. This study proposes that researchers’ authorial identity can be considered in three aspects according to the self-mention devices they employ: the detached self, the individual self and the collective self. Based on a corpus comprising 90 research articles (45 in English and 45 in Chinese), the research explores the construction of authorial identity in English and Chinese research articles by examining the frequency of and roles performed by self-mention markers. Results show that both English and Chinese writers try to display their detached self by distancing themselves from the text and reader. But English writers are more ready to present the individual self by taking on the role of discourse constructor, arguer and evaluator, whereas Chinese writers are inclined to show their collective self and take on the role of researcher. The research results have implications for research article writing and the teaching of research article writing.
Author: Geqi Wu, Yongsheng Zhu
References :
Barton, E. L. (1993) Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance. College English 5 (7): 245–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/378428
Beach, R. and Anson, C. M. (1992) Stance and intertextuality in written discourse. Linguistics and Education 4 (3–4): 335–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90007-J
Bhatia, V. K. (2008) Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. New York: Continuum.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (2000) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Carciu, O. M. (2009). An intercultural study of first-person plural references in biomedical writing. Iberica, 18: 71–92.
Chafe, W. L. and Nichol, J. (eds) (1986) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, HJ: Ablex.
Conrad, S. and Douglas, B. (2000) Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds) Evaluation in Text – Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 56–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Čmejrková, S. and Daneš, F. (1997) Academic writing and cultural identity: The case of Czech academic writing. In A. Duzsak (ed.) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, 40–62. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Diani, G. (2011) Interpersonal metadiscourse in English and Italian university lectures: A cross-cultural analysis of person markers. REAL Studies: Academic Writing in Europe: Empirical Perspectives 5: 65–76.
Duszak, A. (ed.) (1997) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048
Duszak, A. (ed.) (2002) Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam: Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98
Eggins, S. (1994) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
Fløttum, K., Kinn, T. and Dahl, T. (2006) ‘We now report on …’ versus ‘Let us now see how …’: Author roles and interaction with readers in research articles. In K. Hyland and B. Marina (eds) Academic Discourse across Discipline, 203–24. Bern: Peter Lang. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.148
Gao, G. (1998) ‘Don’t take my word for it.’ – Understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22 (2): 163–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00003-0
Gee, J. P. (2000–2001) Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education 25: 99–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1167322
Gong, W. (1998) The role of ethics in persuasive communication – a comparative study of Aristotle’s ‘ethos’ and the Confucian ‘correctness of Names’. In D. R. Heise, and W. Gong (eds) Communication and Culture: China and the World Entering the 21st Century, 3–13. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985) Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999) Construing Meaning through Experience: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn). London: Hodder Education Publishers.
Harwood, N. (2005a) ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted … In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 37 (8): 1207–1231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012
Harwood, N. (2005b) ‘We do not seem to have a theory … The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 26 (3): 343–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012
Han, J. (2010) The Construction of Writer Identity as Self-Promotion in Academic Research Articles. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Hood, S. (2004) Appraising Research: Taking a Stance in Academic Writing. PhD Dissertation, The University of Technology, Sydney.
Hood, S. (2010) Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662
Huang, D, Zhong, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2008) Discourse functions of the first person pronoun: A contrastive study of research article introductions written by Chinese and English scientists. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodic 19 (5): 803–808.
Hunston, S. (1993) Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy (ed.) Register Analysis: Theory and Practice 57–73. London: Pinter.
Hunston, S. (1994) Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis 191–218. London: Routledge.
Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (eds) (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (1997) Scientific claims and community values: Articulating an academic culture. Language and Communication 17 (1): 19-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(96)00023-7
Hyland, K. (1998) Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54
Hyland, K. (1999) Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds) Writing: Text, Process and Practice, 99–121. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2001) Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (3): 207–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
Hyland, K. (2002a) Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8): 1091–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
Hyland, K. (2002b) Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal 56 (4): 351–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351
Hyland, K. (2005a) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2005b) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
Ivanic, R. (1998) Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/swll.5
Ivanic, R. (2006) Language, learning and identification. In R. Kiely, G. Clibbon, P. Rea-Dickins and H. Woodfield (eds) Language, Culture and Identity in Applied Linguistics, 7–29. London: Equinox.
Kim, H. and Markus, H. R. (1999) Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (4): 785–800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.785
Kuo, C. (1999) The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6
Leung, K. (2010) Beliefs in Chinese culture. In B. M. Harris (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology, 221–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541850.013.0016
Martin, J. R. (1997) Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie and J. R. Martin (eds) Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, 3–39. London: Cassell.
Martin, J. R. (2000) Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL in systems in English. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 143–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.
Millán, E. (2010) ‘Extending this claim, we propose …’ The writer’s presence in research articles from different disciplines. Ibérica 20: 35–56.
Nash, W. (ed.) (1990) The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. London: Sage.
Oana M. C. (2009) An intercultural study of first-person plural references in biomedical writing. Ibérica 18: 71–92.
Ochs, E. (1996) Linguistics resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
Ochs, E. and Bambi, S. (1989) Language has a heart. In E. Ochs (ed.) The Pragmatics of Affect. Special Issue of Text 9 (1): 7–25.
Ouyang, H and Tang, S. (2006) Writer identity in Chinese college students’ L2 argumentative writing. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 29 (2): 49–53.
Poudat, C. and Sylvain L. (2005) Authorial presence in academic genres. In E. Tognini-Bonelli and G. D. L. Camiciotti (eds) Strategies in Academic Discourse, 51–67. Amsterdam: Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.19.05pou
Světla, C. and František, D. (1997) Academic writing and cultural identity: The case of Czech academic writing. In A. Duszak (ed.) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, 41–61. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tang, R. and John, S. (1999) The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes 18 (S1): 23–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5
Thetela, P. (1997) Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research Articles. English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 101–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00022-1
Timothy S. B. (2000) Strategic Writing and Organizational Identities. PhD Dissertation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Wood, L, and Kroger, R. (2000) Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wu, S. (2006) Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance. Regional Language Centre Journal 37 (3): 329–349.
Wu, Z. and Pang, J. (2009) The construct of ‘self as author’ by English scholarly journal writers: A case of first person pronouns. Foreign Languages Education: 78–83.
Xu, F. (2011) A corpus-based study of identity chunks in Chinese EFL learners’ academic writing. Foreign Languages Research 127 (3): 57–63.